I've written twice now about the US rebrand of "Artificial Intelligence" to "Super Intelligence," what Executive Order 14434 actually does, and what it means for SEO. Both times I checked US sources. This time I checked home. I wanted to know if "SI" had actually crossed the Pacific into Philippine government policy, the BPO industry that employs close to two million Filipinos, or the local dev and startup scene I've been part of for over a decade.
Short answer: no. Not yet, and maybe not ever. Every PH-side source I could find, government, industry body, and press, kept using "Artificial Intelligence" straight through and after the September 29 signing. That absence is the actual story.
What PH government policy actually says
The Department of Information and Communications Technology isn't sitting still on AI, it's the opposite. In June 2026, DICT and the Civil Service Commission issued Joint Memorandum Circular No. 003, a risk-based governance framework for AI use across the public sector. In September 2026, DICT Secretary Henry Aguda unveiled an AI-powered upgrade to the eGovPH super app, the government's main citizen-services platform. Both documents, both announcements, same word throughout: Artificial Intelligence. Not once did "Super Intelligence" or "SI" show up, even in the week immediately following the White House signing.
There's no Philippine AI Act yet, JMC 003 is a circular, not legislation, but it's the clearest policy anchor the country has right now. If Manila were going to follow Washington's lead on terminology, the eGovPH rollout the week after EO 14434 was the moment to do it. It didn't happen.
Governments copying US terminology isn't rare, "cloud," "digital transformation," and "Industry 4.0" all made the jump into PH policy language within a year or two of catching on stateside. The fact that two live, actively-covered PH government AI initiatives skipped "Super Intelligence" entirely, in the exact window it was dominating US headlines, tells you more than any statement would.
What the BPO industry is actually tracking
The IT-BPM sector is the part of the PH economy with the most at stake in how AI capability actually plays out, nearly two million jobs and tens of billions in export revenue run through it. None of that conversation is happening under the "SI" label either.
- Industry body IBPAP is targeting $42 billion in exports and close to 2 million jobs for 2026, and a longer-term goal of 2 million "AI-enabled Filipino digital workers" by 2028, per Sunstar's 2026 industry coverage. "AI-enabled," not "SI-enabled."
- BusinessWorld reported in July 2026 that AI-driven global competition was forcing the industry to cut its own growth targets, real, immediate pressure, discussed entirely in "AI" terms.
- DOLE, IBPAP, and TESDA ran a joint upskilling push for 10,000 BPO workers in 2026, again framed as AI reskilling, not SI reskilling.
That matters for a specific reason: BPO terminology in the Philippines usually mirrors whatever language US client contracts and SOWs use, with a short lag. If "Super Intelligence" were migrating into outsourced work at all, the BPO sector would be the first place it showed up. It's the first place I checked, and it isn't there.
The developer and startup community signal
This is the softest part of the research, and I want to be straight about that instead of overstating it. I couldn't find a single PH-specific developer thread, meetup announcement, or local tech post built around the "Super Intelligence" rebrand itself. What that tells me isn't "nobody noticed," it's that the term hasn't become load-bearing vocabulary in local conversations about AI tools, hiring, or product building. Builders here are still talking about agents, models, and automation, exactly the terms I've been using in every post on this site, not the branding layer sitting on top of them.
That tracks with what I argued in the SEO piece: the useful shifts, agent orchestration, reasoning models, embodied AI, were already underway before the executive order existed. A name change issued by a foreign government doesn't change what a Manila-based developer calls the thing they're building with. It changes what a press release calls it.
If you're building or hiring in the Philippines, don't track whether "SI" catches on here, it almost certainly won't, not on its own. Track whether US clients start writing "SI" into contracts and job specs. That's the actual transmission path, and it would show up in Upwork and Indeed PH listings before it shows up anywhere else locally.
What this means practically
- Don't rebrand your own services yet. If you run a PH-based agency, consultancy, or freelance profile, changing "AI" to "SI" in your positioning right now would be optimizing for a term almost nobody here is searching or hiring for.
- Watch client-side language, not government language. DICT and IBPAP moving slowly on terminology doesn't mean your next US client brief won't use "SI." Outsourced work follows client vocabulary faster than it follows local policy.
- The underlying skills gap is the real risk, not the label. BusinessWorld's reporting on IT-BPM cutting growth targets is about AI capability displacing certain tasks, not about what anyone calls the technology. That pressure is real whether the industry says "AI" or "SI."
- Local policy will likely lag, then possibly skip the rebrand entirely. JMC 003 shows DICT is capable of moving on AI governance. It also shows they built that framework without adopting US terminology, a strong signal the Philippines may regulate AI on its own vocabulary track regardless of what Washington calls it.
Key takeaways
- No Philippine government body, industry group, or news outlet I could find adopted "Super Intelligence" terminology through or after the September 29, 2026 signing.
- DICT's two biggest AI initiatives in 2026, JMC 003 and the eGovPH AI rollout, both used "Artificial Intelligence" exclusively, including the week immediately after the US order.
- IBPAP and the IT-BPM sector, the PH industry most exposed to AI capability shifts, frame everything in "AI" terms: $42B in exports, 2 million AI-enabled workers by 2028, all unchanged by the US rebrand.
- The clearest transmission path for "SI" into PH business would be US client contracts and job specs, not local government or press, that's the signal worth watching.
- The absence of local coverage is itself the finding: a rebrand this loud in the US made zero measurable dent in PH policy, industry, or developer vocabulary within the first week.
What I'll do next
I'm adding a monthly check of PH job boards and Upwork listings for "SI" or "Super Intelligence" language, the same tracking approach I described for search queries in the SEO post. If it starts showing up in client briefs before it shows up in DICT policy, that'll tell me the transmission path runs through outsourced work first, exactly the pattern BPO terminology has followed before.
FAQ
Has the Philippine government adopted "Super Intelligence" terminology? +
Is the Philippine BPO industry using "Super Intelligence" language?
Should PH-based freelancers or agencies rebrand their services to "SI"?
Does the Philippines have its own AI regulation?
Why does it matter whether PH adopts US AI terminology?
Want this built for your team?
I design AI agents and growth automation that run without babysitting. If that sounds useful, let's talk.
Get in touch →